January 8, 2026

Why “Job Hugging” Is Becoming the Preferred Career Approach in Singapore

Why “Job Hugging” Is Becoming the Preferred Career Approach in Singapore

As part of our ongoing content collaboration with Workforce Singapore, Ethos BeathChapman continues to share market intelligence and hiring insights to support professionals and employers navigating Singapore’s evolving talent landscape.


Instead of frequently switching roles, more professionals are opting to stay longer in their positions, a trend known as “job hugging.” Our experienced consultants, Wanyee Pang, Principal Consultant, Industrial, and Jillian Yip, Director, Accounting and Finance, recently shared their insights with Workforce Singapore (WSG) on this evolving career behaviour and its implications for both employees and employers. 


Career loyalty is making a quiet comeback in Singapore. While job hopping has long been seen as a way to accelerate growth, many workers are now recognising the benefits of committing to a single role or organisation for longer periods. 

 

Defining the Trend: Why Employees Are Clinging to Their Jobs 


“Job hugging” describes the tendency of employees to stay in their current roles, even when they feel unfulfilled. Often, this behaviour stems from a cautious outlook on the economy, concerns about potential layoffs, or simply staying in their comfort zone. While it may provide short-term security, it also raises questions about long-term career growth and personal fulfilment. 


The Employer Perspective 


SMEs and MNCs alike are noticing the effects of job hugging. Wanyee Pang said, “Over the past few years, uncertainty in the market has made employees far more cautious about changing jobs. Many fear the “last-in, first-out” risk if downsizing occurs. For those with families or significant financial commitments, stability tends to outweigh the desire for change. Employees who already enjoy hybrid or flexible work arrangements are less inclined to take the risk of moving, especially when it’s unclear if a new employer can offer the same balance. Increasingly, these non-monetary factors have become just as important as pay or title.” 


Companies are adopting retention strategies, including job redesign, performance frameworks, and talent assessments to ensure cultural fit. Meanwhile, some are investing in AI technology and outsourcing certain roles to maintain productivity and compliance. 


Benefits and Risks for Employees 


Jillian Yip highlights “Employees who choose to “wait it out” in their current firm may stand to gain, especially if they are staying for the right reasons and in a supportive environment. On the flip side, “job hugging” can be counterproductive when employees choose to stay in their current role for one sole reason — comfort and stability, even at the risk of stagnation.” 

 

Staying longer in a role can be advantageous if employees continue to grow, gain new responsibilities, or deepen expertise. Conversely, remaining in a position purely for comfort may lead to stagnation, skill atrophy, or reduced marketability. Making deliberate choices about career moves ensures that stability does not come at the expense of long-term prospects. 


Advice for Job Huggers 


Employees should evaluate whether their current role aligns with their mid- to long-term career goals.  Jillian Yip advises, “My advice would be to have clarity on your mid- to long-term career aspirations. If staying in your current role does not hinder your overall career trajectory or the direction you aim to move toward, then there is no harm in staying. This is especially if it offers you growth in other forms, such as broader exposure, deeper expertise, or leadership opportunities.” 


This article includes insights from Wanyee Pang, Jillian Yip, and Stef Chua, contributed in collaboration with Workforce Singapore. Read the full original article here.

By Shazamme System User May 5, 2026
EBC Latest Report
By Shazamme System User April 27, 2026
EBC Latest Report
By Shazamme System User April 17, 2026
As some organisations approach the end of their financial year while others begin a new chapter, I recognise that this is not the first time I have written about the interplay between HR and Finance. However, in today’s climate marked by ongoing geopolitical uncertainty, tighter cost controls, and an unrelenting need for high-quality talent, the partnership between these two functions has never been more critical. Organisations are being challenged to do more with less, while simultaneously building capabilities for the future. This creates a natural tension: cost discipline vs. talent investment. Finance drives accountability, efficiency, and return on investment. HR ensures the organisation has the capability, agility, and leadership to deliver on those expectations. The reality is that transformation today sits squarely at the intersection of both. Without financial discipline, transformation lacks sustainability. Without the right talent, it fails in execution Most transformation failures are not due to flawed strategy, but poor execution, whereby common breakdowns include: Misaligned leadership priorities Cultural resistance to change Critical talent gaps From a finance perspective, these show up as cost overruns, delayed ROI, and unrealised value creation. From an HR perspective, they manifest as disengagement, capability gaps, and organisational friction. The takeaway is clear: financial outcomes are deeply tied to people outcomes. Where HR & Finance Jointly Drive Impact Linking Talent Investment to Business Strategy Transformation requires capital, but increasingly, that capital is deployed into talent. Take organisations shifting toward sustainability as an example. This shift requires more than strategic intent, it demands new skill sets, new roles, and a rethinking of workforce priorities. In such cases, HR plays a critical role in realigning talent strategy to support long-term business goals, ensuring the organisation is equipped to execute effectively. From a finance perspective, this is about disciplined capital allocation into high-impact, strategic roles. From an HR perspective, it is about building capabilities and aligning the workforce to evolving business needs. Culture as a Measurable Performance Lever Culture may be difficult to quantify, but its impact on business performance is undeniable. Rigid or low-trust environments often lead to slower decision-making, weaker innovation, reduced productivity, and higher turnover. Organisations who address this by embedding candid, open feedback mechanisms, encourages challenge, experimentation, and faster problem-solving. From a finance perspective, this drives higher productivity and faster innovation cycles. From a HR perspective, it builds psychological safety and stronger employee engagement. The outcome is a culture that accelerates execution and delivers sustained commercial performance. Reskilling as a Capital Allocation Strategy In a constrained hiring market, “build vs. buy” is no longer just a talent question, it has become a capital allocation decision. Organisations that invest strategically in upskilling and reskilling can future-proof their workforce while reducing reliance on external hiring. From a finance lens, this results in improved return on talent investment and lower recruitment costs. From a HR lens, this promotes greater workforce agility, internal mobility and even succession planning. Driving Execution Through Leadership Alignment Even the best strategies can fail without aligned execution across leadership teams. HR plays a critical role in ensuring that leaders are coordinated, priorities are clear, and the organisation is equipped to deliver strategic initiatives effectively. When leadership is aligned, organisations deploy resources more efficiently, accelerate the realisation of financial and strategic goals, and reduce the risk of costly delays or misdirected investments. Clear alignment also ensures that investments in talent, such as reskilling, development, and leadership programs, translate into measurable business outcomes. The result is a cohesive organisation capable of executing complex strategies efficiently, driving sustainable growth, and maximising the return on both capital and human resources. In conclusion, organisations that successfully integrate both Finance and HR perspectives are better positioned to: Deliver transformation on time and within budget Maximise return on talent investments Build resilience in an increasingly uncertain environment In today’s landscape, competitive advantage no longer comes from strategy alone, it comes from the ability to align financial discipline with workforce capability. For organisations navigating transformation, having the right people in place is critical. If you would like to discuss this topic in more detail, explore market insights, or get support in identifying and recruiting the talent your team needs to succeed, feel free to reach out to Jillian Yip , Director, Accounting & Finance.
Show More

Share this article